Tag Archive for: Unpaid Wages

Women in Construction

Part I – Common Claims

Women construction workersConstruction is one of the largest industries in the country. Jobs in the construction industry can offer a viable pathway to financial security, particularly for workers without a four-year undergraduate degree. My grandfather, who left high school at an early age, worked his entire life in the construction industry. By securing a union job in construction he was able to support his wife and three kids, including sending my mother to college (she was part of the first freshman class of women accepted at her school). Securing a job in construction can provide a worker—and their family—with life-changing opportunities.

But construction remains a male-dominated field. According to an August 2025 report from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR), even though the number of women working in construction nationally has grown in the past decade, “tradeswomen [still make up] only 4.3 percent of all construction trade workers.”  The same holds true in Massachusetts. The 2025 Massachusetts Workforce Data Report issued by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Labor & Workforce Development, confirms that women in Massachusetts remain under-represented in the state’s construction industry and that work in construction is a “gendered” job.

Women face several barriers to entering and remaining in the profession. Discrimination and harassment are two of the barriers: women in the industry report worksite hostility and harassment as reasons they consider leaving the profession, and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has identified combatting gender-based discrimination in recruitment and hiring, as one of its Strategic Enforcement Priorities for 2024-2028.

And while the construction industry offers many opportunities for financial stability, it remains plagued with wage and hour violations. The Massachusetts Attorney General Office’s 2025 Labor Day Report states that the construction industry had the second-highest Fair Labor Division enforcement amounts for Fiscal Year 2025. According to the report, the Attorney General Office’s Fair Labor Division issued approximately 300 citations against employers in the construction industry and the office assessed nearly $3.1 million in penalties and restitution against these employers.

Our office regularly represents workers in the construction industry. Through private enforcement of Massachusetts wage and hour and anti-discrimination laws, we seek to contribute to the efforts of government agencies and organizations working to improve opportunities and conditions for women in construction.

In addition to the unpaid wage and overtime cases we handle within the construction industry, some other common claims that our office assesses when working with women in the construction industry include:

Discrimination: An employer cannot make an employment decision based on a candidate or employee’s gender. For example, it is unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire a candidate because she is a woman, to assign fewer hours to an employee because she is a woman or to fail to promote an employee because she is a woman.

Harassment: Anti-discrimination laws also protect employees from certain sex-based harassment. An example of harassment based on sex drawn from the EEOC’s Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace would be “a construction worker on a road crew, [being] subjected to sex-based epithets and other demeaning sex-based language by her supervisor, such as ‘sandwich-maker’ and ‘baby[,]’ [and] disparag[ing remarks from her supervisor about] women’s participation in the construction industry, for example by stating that road construction is ‘a man’s job.’” Sex-based harassment also includes sexual harassment, and can include pregnancy-based harassment (there are also more specific protections in place for pregnant workers, under state and federal law).

Independent Contractor Misclassification: Massachusetts follows a strict employee status test, commonly known as the “ABC test,” which determines whether the worker has a right to employee wage and hour protections such as the right to timely payment of earned wages, the right to minimum wages, the right to overtime, and the right travel expense reimbursement for intraday travel. When an employer misclassifies a worker as an independent contractor (when that worker should be an employee according to the “ABC test”), we refer to it as independent contractor misclassification. Construction work is a commonly misclassified job. According to one recent study, “a typical construction worker, [classified] as an independent contractor, would lose as much as $19,526 per year in income and job benefits compared with what they would have earned as an employee.” Individualized assessment is needed to understand what losses might have occurred due to misclassification.

Prevailing Wage: Prevailing wage refers to mandated hourly rates that construction workers must receive for working on certain public projects. You can read more about our firm’s work on prevailing wage cases, and its connection to independent contractor misclassification.

Retaliation: Too often, workers are afraid to report discrimination, harassment, or wage and hour violations due to fear of retaliation. Anti-discrimination laws forbid employers from retaliating against employees for engaging in “protected conduct,” which refers to conduct that opposes the unlawful discrimination (for example, reporting the unlawful discrimination to HR). Massachusetts wage law also forbids employers from retaliating against employees for asserting their statutory wage and hour rights. M.G.L. c. 149, § 148A (“No employee shall be penalized by an employer in any way as a result of any action on the part of an employee to seek his or her rights under the wages and hours provisions of this chapter.”). Retaliation can take the form of demotion, termination of employment, a reduction in hours, or rescheduling to an undesirable assignment, to name a few examples. These examples are drawn from the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Fair Labor Division’s Anti-Retaliation Protections under the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws FAQ Sheet.

Medical Leave: Those working in construction have medical leave rights just like other employees in Massachusetts. Here’s how PFML rights and claims work in Massachusetts.

This post only provides a summary of common employment law claims that arise for women in construction. To understand whether you may have a viable claim, feel free to reach out for an individualized assessment.

Author’s Note: The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency responsible for enforcing federal anti-discrimination employment laws, identified combatting discrimination in the construction industry as one of its strategic enforcement priorities for 2024-2028. Much of this post draws on its report, Building for the Future: Advancing Equal Employment Opportunity in the Construction Industry, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Report of Chair Charlotte A. Burrows, May 2023 [“Building for the Future”], which is no longer available online. Other resources from the EEOC on the topic include Knocking Down Walls: Discrimination and Harassment in Construction from the Commission’s May 17, 2022, hearing and “Combating Employment Discrimination in Construction.

My employer didn’t pay me, what can I do: What Do You Do if Your Employer Doesn’t Pay You

What do I do if my employer won't pay me. Employment Lawyers at Massachusetts Wage Law.

What do you do if your employer doesn’t pay you? Well, if your employer has not paid you your paycheck, Massachusetts law guarantees you certain rights. First, your employer must pay you within six days after your pay period ends (seven days if you work a seven-day workweek). If you are fired, your employer must pay you all your earned wages on your last day of work. M.G.L. c. 149, § 148 (“any employee discharged from such employment shall be paid in full on the day of his discharge.”) Earned wages includes any earned, but unused vacation pay due “under an oral or written agreement” and any commissions that are “definitely determined and has become due and payable.”

It is smart to contact an attorney ASAP if you believe that you were not paid your earned wages as required by law. The law states that an employer may not make payment of the wages after the filing of a complaint and use it as a defense in the case. If it weren’t for this law, employers could simply not pay, make employees spend time and money their earned wages, then finally pay with no real downside. Further strengthening employees’ hands, the law states that an employee who wins their case may receive three times their unpaid wages in Massachusetts plus the attorneys’ fees and costs necessary to prosecute the lawsuit. if the employee takes their case to court and wins. In other words, if you don’t get paid, you don’t have to go into debt to get your money.

If you are still employed, and your employer has failed to pay you your earned wages, the law also protects you from retaliation as you attempt to obtain your money. When an employee complains about overtime or unpaid wages in Massachusetts, under state law, the employee is protected from discharge or other punishment because of the complaint. This protection extends to formal complaints filed in court or with the attorney general, but also includes protection for making informal written or verbal complaints directly to your employer for violations of the Wage Act or overtime law.

If you are terminated or fired from a job and not paid in full the same day, it is prudent to leave with written evidence that you were fired and did not quit. If you can’t get a written acknowledgment of your termination, make note of any witnesses to the fact that you were fired and did not quit. If you are contacted while at home or otherwise away from the job site and terminated, it is smart to respond in writing (an email is fine) and ask for your final pay. If your employer fails to pay you, you will have a solid claim.

 

Wondering what do you do if your employer doesn’t pay you? Reach Out to Us for the Answer  

Don’t let your employer deny you pay. Whether you’re still employed or recently fired, our team can provide the support you need. Call us or fill out the form below for a free case review to find out if you have a claim.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Wage Class Action Certified in Massachusetts Superior Court

On September 13, 2017, the Massachusetts Superior Court for Suffolk County certified a class action against Helping Hands Company, Inc., a provider of home care services in Massachusetts. Escorbor v. Helping Hands Co., Inc, C.A. No. 15-2053-D. (Suffolk Sup. Crt. 2017) (Wilkins, J.). Our firm was appointed class counsel. The case is for the unpaid wages and expenses of home care aides who travel between clients’ homes without pay during the workday. The class certification motion was vigorously contested and the decision is notable because the Court affirmed several important concepts for workers in Massachusetts.

  1. The plaintiffs’ theory of liability controls at the class certification stage.
  2. The Massachusetts Wage Act provides an independent statutory basis for class actions. Here, the class satisfied the traditional Rule 23 requirements, but in another case where, for example, traditional numerosity wasn’t satisfied, the statutory basis for class actions, which only requires that employees be “similarly situated,” might be utilized.
  3. The failure of an employer to keep track of work time–required by state statute and regulation–may warrant an injunction in favor of a class that might require, as a remedy, an employer to reconstruct time records.
  4. An employer cannot get a credit for a wage that is due and owing by pointing to another payment that was meant for another purpose.
  5. Variance in damages among class members does not prevent the certification of a class.
  6. The Wage Act favors class actions because, in part, they help employees get paid wages without antagonizing an employer, i.e. only one employee has to stick her neck out for the the whole group.

The court also wrote that, “During motion practice and in oral arguments, the Court has observed first-hand the adequacy and competence of class counsel,” id. at 10, which was gratifying to read. The case continues, but now as a class action. I am sure that each side is weighing their options.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields