Tag Archive for: Wage Class Action

Massachusetts Wage Class Actions

Massachusetts Wage Class Action Group of People Showing Unity

Claims under the Massachusetts Wage Act can sometimes be brought as class actions. This usually makes sense when there is a common policy or practice of the employer that affects many employees in a similar way. There are many examples of these types of policies and practices. Just a few include:

  1. Not paying for short breaks
  2. Wrongfully classifying certain groups of employees as exempt from overtime
  3. A policy requiring off-the-clock work
  4. Not paying for inter-day travel time or mandatory travel back to the employer’s location at the end of the day
  5. Illegal deductions from wages or tips

There can be many more examples. However, the key is usually a common policy or practice that is illegal and that affects many employees in a similar way.

The Supreme Judicial Court discussed Wage Act class actions in some detail in this case: Salvas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 452 Mass. 337 (2008). The basic requirements of a class action are:

  1. Numerosity: There are enough people in the class, usually more than 40 are required.
  2. Commonality: Common questions affect all or a substantial number of the class members.
  3. Typicality: The claims come out of the same policies, patterns or practices and are based on the same legal theories.
  4. Fair representation by the class representatives: the plaintiff (class representative) does not have a conflict with the class, and counsel is able, qualified and experienced.
  5. Predominance of common issues of law and fact over individual issues.
  6. Superiority of a class action over individual cases: This is related to the predominance requirement and basically means that a class action is better than a bunch of individual cases. This has much to do with the uniformity of the policy and practices involved and the effect of those policies on the class members.

Plaintiffs who act as class representatives have a duty to the class. They have a duty to seek a just result for the entire class, not just for themselves. However, in exchange for being this instrument of common justice, class representatives often receive court-approved monetary incentive payments.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Case Report: Massachusetts Superior Court Certifies Home Health Aide Class Action

On February 25, 2019, the Massachusetts Superior Court for Suffolk County certified three classes of home health aides in Portillo, et al., v. Compassionate Homecare Inc., et al., Case No. 17-0283A, an unpaid wage class action. Our law firm was appointed as class counsel for the employees.

In our motion for class certification, we argued that the employees had suffered similarly due to three different violations of the Massachusetts Wage Act:

  1. Employees worked more than 40 hours in a workweek and were not paid overtime wages for those overtime hours.
  2. Employees were not paid wages for the time between client appointments during the workday, or reimbursed for transportation expenses.
  3. Employees were not paid for all of their hours worked on the date of their termination.

The defendants opposed the motion, but the judge agreed with the employees and certified an Overtime Class, a Travel Class, and a Lay-Off Class.

If you worked for Compassionate Homecare between January 2011 and the present, or if you are an employee at a different company facing similar issues, feel free to contact us.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

Pending Wage Class Action: Massachusetts Home Health Care Agency

Our firm has filed suit against a Massachusetts home health care agency and its local franchisee on behalf of a putative class of home care aids (also sometimes called “home health aids”).

The class action complaint seeks back wages, including treble damages, for the Massachusetts home health care agency’s violations of Massachusetts wage and hour laws. Right at Home, and its franchisee, employ several hundred hourly home care aids in Massachusetts who provide in-home health care, companionship, cleaning and personal care to the sick, disabled, and elderly.

These home care aides must use their own vehicles to travel from home to home to provide these services. However, the defendants fail to pay their employees for this travel time, as required by law. The defendants also fail to reimburse their workers for all transportation expenses, as required by Massachusetts Regulations, 454 Code Mass. Regs. 27.04.

The litigation is currently in the discovery phase. Feel free to contact us if you have information regarding the failure of a Massachusetts home health care agency to pay for intra-day travel time or to reimburse employees for travel-related expenses. Note: this applies to travel during the work day and not to travel between home and work at the beginning or end of the day.

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields